Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Blog
While personally viewing Donnie Darko for the first time, I was in a complete stupor after the ending. I ended up spending the rest of the night researching the internet for answers to this movie, which was to no avail. Movies today reflect the attitudes of our teen generation. Just go through a store and you can find multiple items that offer “instant satisfaction.” What happened to the times of exploring and researching a topic to come to your own conclusion? Donnie Darko goes against the grain, especially in this aspect of society.
Without giving away any type of information about the movie, I urge everyone to watch it. Not just put it in your DVD player and have it play in the background while you do something else, but actively listen and pay attention to each and every detail. If you have to watch it more than once to pick up some details, please do. If you do so, this movie will make you question your thoughts on so many powerful ideas(hopefully). In other words, it's awesome. Rent/buy immediately!
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Case Study
Along with feelings influencing my papers, I can also see my temperament influencing my papers. Days when I feel angry are when my papers are full of raw emotion. I'm not really concerned about the structure but just getting words into the paper. It would never be something I would turn in, but when I'm mad is when I get a lot of detail into the paper. Days when I'm feeling in a good mood influences my paper, as well. These are days when I will sit down, turn some music on and work on my paper as a whole. Rather than just getting ideas down, I'll sit and make sure structure is evident and that the ideas flow smoothly in the paper as well.
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Blog
Pitching up until the 1960's was the centerpiece for most major league baseball teams. While teams depended on big hitters like Babe Ruth, Eddie Mathews, Jimmie Foxx and others, the starting pitcher dictated whether the team won or lost that game. While it is a rarity to see a starting pitcher throw seven innings in a baseball game today, it was a rarity for a starting pitcher not to pitch at least seven innings. Pitching so deep into every baseball game ultimately decided how the game was going to turn out and is also the reason why most pitching records are held by players who played in the early twentieth century. Pitchers like Cy Young, Warren Spahn, Walter Johnson and many others have won well over 300 games because of their ability to pitch many innings at a time and the pitching concept led managers to keep starting pitchers in as long as possible. Hall of fame pitchers from today's pitching concept can still win over 300 games, but usually can only amass 250 victories throughout a full career. This is due partly to the change of the pitching rotation in the mid 1960's or so. Up until this time, teams carried four starting pitchers that were expected to pitch every fourth day as long as they possibly could. The idea of keeping more hitters on the bench rather than pitchers was important because the strategy of the game was skewed towards manufacturing runs with pinch runners and pinch hitters rather than today's current strategy.
In today's “new” concept, pitching has become a premium on the roster. This has changed due to many different reasons. Like everything in the world today, money is a big factor. General Managers are concerned about hurting the pitcher's arm, so they limit the amount of pitches or innings they can throw. Also, match-up pitching has become very popular. Using statistics, MLB teams can find out whether hitters are good against left or right handed pitchers and can even find out how good a hitter is on fastballs or breaking pitches. Due to this new information being kept in the “new” pitching concept era, teams usually keep up to 10 or 11 relievers to try to counter attack against a big hitter late in the game that could decide a win or loss. In Whitey Herzog's book You're Missin' a Great Game, Herzog talks about the planning each game took because of the new use of relievers. “You'll never know what reliever you'll need tomorrow, so the best thing is just to have depth on your staff” (Herzog 120). With all the different match-up's that were possible, it was vital to keep that many relievers in the “new” era of pitching.
While many people can debate over which concept is better, there are clear-cut positives for both concepts. Being able to pitch deep into ball games allowed teams only to keep 8 or so pitchers which gave the team that extra dangerous player on the bench who could get that important hit, steal a base or be able to sacrifice the runner to the next base. The game itself was much more of one starting pitcher against another. The better pitcher on that day would be the deciding factor in a victory or loss. In today's new concept, a baseball game has evolved into much more than just one starting pitcher against another. With pitch counts, expanded pitching rotation and risk factoring into each pitcher, the amount of innings pitched by starting pitchers has decreased. While some old time baseball fans may hate this new style, less arm strain on a pitcher could extend his career multiple years. Also, it may be more challenging for a hitter because of a new pitcher almost every other inning due to match-up relievers
